Custom Google Search
Thursday, October 22, 2009
True That
-Gail Goodwin
American Novelist
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Monday, July 27, 2009
Summer Reading
Sunday, July 19, 2009
The Rod
The tongue of the wise will approve of good sense, and the mouth of imbeciles will cause folly to flow. (Mishlei 15:2)
When I’m not writing pieces for Cross-Currents, I’m involved in face-to-face education. As my years in the field pile up, it is inevitable that I expand my repertoire beyond just knowing how to teach Torah, to developing techniques for dealing with the students who are less motivated. This lack of motivation can be attributed to various causes. One critical area of concern is general lack of belief in oneself as a valued person, as one who has the potential for greatness. This feeling is one of the primary indicators of an at-risk child.
It is well known that one of the basic lessons of education, for parents and teachers alike, is the necessity of positive reinforcement. Focusing only on the negative, while being blasẻ when something good happens, is often a recipe for bitterness and despondency.
There is an educational approach known as “The Nurtured Heart Initiative,” or “The Inner Wealth Initiative,” developed by Dr. Howard Glasser, that takes the above to the next level, inverting the equation altogether. The concept is that “difficult children seek intense relationships, and they quickly learn that they can readily engage and control others through negative behavior. These children can become almost addicted to the rush of this kind of relationship” (The Inner Wealth Initiative, pg. 165).
What this approach does is intentionally pour on huge amounts of positive energy when the student is doing something positive, and reflecting it back at him as a display of his own greatness being realized. This includes being specific with praise, consistency, and constantly being on the lookout for displays of the values you want to instill -responsibility, social grace, honesty, good judgment, etc.
These positive interactions will sometimes involve being creative in recognition of when the child is doing something right, or even manufacturing such situations. There are endless opportunities to see a child doing something good, even the difficult child. If you see your young child closing the door to the car, pour it on. He is showing concern for his personal safety, acting responsibly, etc. Let him know that. Put it in the context of the Torah’s appreciation of these traits – and he is thrilled to be a Jew. The point is a relentless, sincere appreciation of the child’s realization of the myriad talents he possesses, as milestones on his road to gadlus, Torah greatness.
“Hakadosh Baruch Hu wanted Bnei Yisrael to accrue merit, therefore he gave them an abundance of Torah and Mitzvos” (Makkos 23b). A major benefit of this approach is that the child senses that rules are not there only to be adhered to or broken, a burden and a bore, but they are there as opportunities for growth.
It is told of Rav Isser Zalman Meltzer zt”l, that part of his greatness as a mechanech was his ability to take any question asked by a student and rephrase it as a masterpiece of learning, always leaving the student with a sense of dignity and self-worth, even if sometimes clueless as to what it was he purportedly asked. This occasionally takes the brilliance of a Rav Isser Zalman. However, any Rebbe can celebrate the achievement of his withdrawn student asking a question! Energetic, warm, sincere praise for the interaction, stated as a reflection of the student’s quest for knowledge, is like rain in a parched desert for many relationship-starved, unmotivated students.
It seems that this is the meaning of Rav Wolbe’s assertion in “Building and Planting in Chinuch” , based on the verse in Zecharia 11:7, that the “rod” in the verse “He that spares the rod hates the child,” can also be referring to the rod of pleasantness. He writes: “We must recognize that the rod of pleasantness is also a rod, but it causes no pain. When I offer encouragement, it too is a rod.” Perhaps encouragement is called a rod because its effectiveness depends on the energy that is expended in its use.
On the negative side of things, problems and poor choices should not be given much attention and energy, and they thus become unnecessary as a way to gain relationships. To be sure, rules are strictly enforced, but not with high intensity interactions, long-winded lectures and the like. These reactions are perceived by the relationship-seeking child as an energetic reward, and encourage more of the same. The “action” happens when good things take place, and that is where the student naturally wants to be.
There are other elements to this approach that are beyond the scope of this piece. I would encourage parents and teachers of unmotivated or difficult children to do further reading, and ascertain whether it is worth a try in their homes or classrooms. I believe it has great potential in making many amongst our youth, who lack the crucial feeling of inner wealth, believe in themselves once again.
[Rabbi Beckerman is a Ram in Yeshivas Ohr Yerushalayim]
Friday, July 17, 2009
Hello? Is Anyone Reading this Stuff?
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Monday, July 6, 2009
Summer Break?
Monday, June 8, 2009
This is Just Turning into a Link-fest
Friday, June 5, 2009
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
I am Sho-cked
Monday, May 18, 2009
The Fire of Torah?
Friday, May 15, 2009
RCA Resolutions - Day Schools
The current global financial downturn has adversely affected Jewish communities far and wide. One potentially devastating result, for younger families, is the challenge of affording Jewish day school tuition.
A double curriculum, particularly on the high school level, requires twice the faculty needed for general studies, causing a great deal of additional expense. Even before the current economic crisis, charter schools teaching Hebrew language and Jewish history, as well as public schools that would permit Jewish studies to be taught to select students during the school day, were proposed as cost-cutting options.
Considerable research has demonstrated that the years spent in a Jewish day school environment play a powerful and essential role in Jewish identity formation and ongoing commitment to observance and Jewish community. Even proposed "Hebrew language" charter schools fail to provide an environment conducive to the development of deep-seated Jewish identity. Further, these schools are mandated to teach limited aspects of Jewish culture, self-consciously avoiding Torah and mitzvot.
Were a shortage of funds to force us to reprise the situation of past decades, in which relatively few young members of even the Orthodox community were able to receive a day school education, this would constitute a substantive demolishment of one of the crucial building blocks of our families, neighborhoods, communities, and cities. This would turn back the clock on the many years invested in achieving the current level of availability of day school education, and the concomitant positive results.
Be it resolved that we urgently encourage our Jewish communities to creatively make the maximum possible assistance available to students in need, so that they will receive the total Jewish education they desperately need and deserve.
Be it further resolved that Jewish day schools must engage in serious and effective cost-cutting, to insure that their operations are as lean and cost-efficient as possible.
We further call upon rabbis and their constituents to re-evaluate the needs of their community schools and the distribution of their tzedaka funds, so as to direct them inwardly, where such is required.
We further urge rabbanim to emphasize to their congregants that the obligation to support Jewish day schools is not limited to the parent body, but applies to the entire community. Indeed, only through such an understanding will our educational institutions survive the current economic downturn as well as thrive, and offer our children the education and experience that is so necessary for their Jewish success.
I Figured
Friday, May 1, 2009
It's Genii Brian...It's Genii
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Monday, April 27, 2009
Rancor Where Public-School Parents Make Private-School Decisions
In my opinion, it seems as though it is a lose-lose situation. Although I do feel it is important for the Jewish people to protect themselves economically, it seems to be causing a big Chillul Hashem. So, in the long run is it really worth it? Rancor is a harsh word.
Many of the Orthodox here and elsewhere feel crushed by the weight of high
school taxes and private school tuition. Making sure the school district is
fiscally prudent seems a necessity.
That makes sense...Yeshiva tuition is completely out-of-control expensive. Why shouldn't I protect myself from additional higher taxes coming from Public Schools which aren't economically sound or feasible.
But increasingly, others are chafing at the idea that people who don’t send
their children to the public schools are making the decisions for those from
very different cultures who do.
I can imagine why that's frustrating, but I am paying for this service to be provided, so why shouldn't my opinion matter?
“The current system doesn’t address the question of governance with the consent
of the governed,” he said, adding, “It doesn’t feel like America.”
Isn't this democracy? It is certainly a shame that these public school families live in a district that is heavily populated with Jewish people, which may put there schools under the microscope. However, this "governance" is "with the consent of the governed," in that the majority have voted one way. For example, is this any different than a certain public service offered for a long time by a local government (which those politicians may or may not use) which is then over turned when a new party, or even a new leader, takes over? If a majority of democrats outvote the republicans in office, are the new leaders implementing "governance without consent of the governed?" Don't the higher-ups decide whether or not their are going to be vouchers for parents (many of whom do so for religous reasons) send their children to public school? Do they always factor in our "consent"?
The enduring dynamic here and elsewhere is the Orthodox voting in huge numbers
and, invariably, for one of their own. Competing here with splintered,
low-income, ethnic constituencies, they invariably get the votes.
Is this an abuse of the system that should lead to "Rancor?"
Of course, not all victories are worth the costs. And critics ask how the
yeshiva parents in Ramapo would feel if the decisions about its schools were
dictated by local black or Hispanic residents.
Many of these parents would not appreciate it. This is why they send their children to schools where the decisions are made privately, and not open to the masses to vote on. Does this comparison really work?
The issue has percolated since the Orthodox gained control of the board a few
years back. It gained a measure of acrimony a year ago when...
Of course, if there is any foul play involved it should be stopped. No one here is advocating an abuse of the system in any way.
Again, even if the argument is correct, we must assess whether it is worth its rammifications. And, no one here is looking to shut down schools without reason. The key is to make sure everything is financially sound and to provide the best education accordingly.
Oh boy...
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Mr. Roboto
Midos Alert!
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
I Foot Believe It!
Friday, April 17, 2009
Facebook Lomdus
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Interesting approach to education
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512569,00.html
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Inspired by Us
We're All Shomer Negiah
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Mussar on the Court
Friday, January 30, 2009
I knew it!!
Ridiculous
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Let it Snow!
Good Title
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Just planting seeds
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/31/education/31jimmy.html
Monday, January 19, 2009
Parshas Shemos
Most of this week’s פרשה details the birth, development, and appointment of משה רבינו as the leader of בני ישראל. Yet there aren't many details in the פסוקים. Perhaps this is what motivates רש"י to make the comments he does on a פסוק towards the beginning of the פרשה.
פרק ב' פסוק ז' says "...וקראתי לך אשה מינקת מן העבריות..." - “…and summon for you a wet nurse from the Hebrew women…”. Miriam volunteers to find a Hebrew to nurse Moshe. רש"י quotes the מדרש that states that the fact that מרים specified she would get a wet nurse from the "עבריות" teaches us that בת פרעה took משה around to many מצרי women to for them to nurse משה, but משה didn’t nurse from them "לפי שהיתה עתיד לדבר עם השכינה" – “because he was destined to speak with ה' in the future.” Apparently, as an infant, משה knew he would be speaking to ה' and didn’t want to contaminate his mouth with Egyptian milk.
The שפתי חכמים asks, how do we know that משה refused to be nursed by מצריות specifically because he was going to speak with ה'? Maybe it was because he recognized his mother – he was already 3 months old and had been nursed by יוכבד!? He answers that it says "ותצפנהו" - Yocheved hid משה for three months. Presumably, משה was hidden in the dark and therefore probably did not recognize his mother. And so the מדרש’s explanation – that משה’s refusal to nurse from מצרי women was because of his role in the future – is a reasonable one, according to the שפתי חכמים.
Interestingly, this idea is cited as the מקור for a particular הלכה. The רמ"א in Yoreh De'ah (פא:ז) says that חלב מצרית כחלב ישראלית - the milk is the same, whether it comes from an Egyptian woman are a Jewish woman. He continues, though, that nevertheless, a Jewish child should not be nursed by a מצרית if a ישראלית is available (because the milk from an עובדת כוכבים will dull a child’s heart and make the child bad-natured).
The Vilan Gaon says that the רשב"א cites משה רבינו as the source. Since משה refused to be nursed by a מצרית, we try to avoid it as well. But as the אמת ליעקב points out, this is a strange source for the הלכה! Moshe's refusal was because of his destiny – his future – when he would converse with ה'. Is that really applicable to all of the children of כלל ישראל?! Do we really think that every child will talk to הקב"ה?
The אמת ליעקב answers with a beautiful idea about חנוך. No, we don’t think every child will speak to ה', but we do think that every child has the potential to speak to ה'. Therefore, the way we approach educating our children should be by thinking that this child could end up speaking with ה'.
I don’t know how literally we are to take this, but the message is an appropriate one. As parents and teachers, we should approach our children and students with that perspective – that they are capable of great things in the future. That’s how seriously we need to think about how we educate them. And perhaps more important than us realizing this, our children need to be told this – that they too are capable of tremendous things and can reach great heights.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Chalos Sheim
"We decided from an early stage we didn't want to use the word 'school'," she told local newspaper the Sheffield Star."This is Watercliffe Meadow, a place for learning. One reason was many of the parents of the children here had very negative connotations of school."Instead we want this to a be a place for family learning, where anyone can come.
"We were able to start from scratch and create a new type of learning experience. There are no whistles or bells or locked doors. We wanted to de-institutionalize the place and bring the school closer to real life."
In Jewish day schools especially they try to create a community of learning, so is the word "school" too limiting?